16

Mandibular fractures represent one of the most common injuries of the maxillofacial region, accounting for 70% to 85% of all facial skeleton fractures according to various studies. The high frequency of this pathology is due to the anatomical features of the mandible, its mobility, and its prominent position in the facial skeleton, which makes it vulnerable to various traumatic impacts. The social significance of the problem is determined by the predominant affliction of working-age individuals (20-40 years), which leads to significant economic losses associated with temporary disability and treatment costs

  • Read count 16
  • Date of publication 10-06-2025
  • Main LanguageIngliz
  • Pages68-72
English

Mandibular fractures represent one of the most common injuries of the maxillofacial region, accounting for 70% to 85% of all facial skeleton fractures according to various studies. The high frequency of this pathology is due to the anatomical features of the mandible, its mobility, and its prominent position in the facial skeleton, which makes it vulnerable to various traumatic impacts. The social significance of the problem is determined by the predominant affliction of working-age individuals (20-40 years), which leads to significant economic losses associated with temporary disability and treatment costs

№ Author name position Name of organisation
1 Gaffarov U.B. PhD Samarkand State Medical University
№ Name of reference
1 1.Afanasyev V.V., Ushakov A.I., Zudilin A.V. Surgical Dentistry: Textbook. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2022. 744 p.2.Barannik N.G., Varzhapetyan S.D., Kabakov A.E. Modern principles of treatment of mandibular fractures // Modern Dentistry. 2021. No 3(103). P. 52-56.3.Glinnik A.V., Pokhodenko-Chudakova I.O., GorbachevaK.A. Comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis methods for mandibular fractures // Modern Dentistry. 2022. No 2. P. 38-42.4.Drobyshev A.Yu., Sviridov E.G., Dikarev A.S. Osteosynthesis of the mandible using individual titanium implants // Russian Dental Journal. 2020. No 24(6). P. 354-359.5.Kulakov A.A., Butova V.G., Brailovskaya T.V. Features of organizing medical care for patients with jaw fractures based on innovative technologies // Dentistry. 2021. No 100(1). P. 89-92.6.Panin M.G., Kuznetsova E.A., Solovyev M.M. Digital technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of mandibular fractures // Institute of Dentistry. 2022. No 2(95). P. 78-81.7.Robustova T.G. Surgical Dentistry. Moscow: Medicine, 2021. 688 p.8.Timofeev A.A., Gorobets E.V. Mandibular Fractures: Features of Clinical Course, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Kiev: LLC "Chervona Ruta-Tours", 2022. 216 p.9.Alpert B., Kushner G.M., Tiwana P.S. Contemporary treatment of mandibular fractures // Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2020. Vol. 32(1). P. 31-46.10.Chrcanovic B.R. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022. Vol. 51(2). P. 133-147.11.Damien S., Meara J.G. Evolution of management for pediatric mandibular fractures // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2021. Vol. 32(3). P. 1089-1093.12.Foresta E., Torroni A., Gasparini G., Saponaro G., Longo G., Boniello R., Marianetti T.M., Pelo S. Use of N-2-butyl-cyanoacrylate (Glubran2®) in fractures of orbital-maxillo-zygomatic complex // Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2020. Vol. 19(2). P. 299-304.13.Gali R., Devireddy S.K., Venkata K.K., Kanubaddy S.R., Nemaly C., Akheel M. Faciomaxillary fractures in a semi-urban tertiary health care center: a retrospective study // World Journal of Dentistry. 2021. Vol. 8(5). P. 386-390.14.Hsueh W.D., Schechter C.B., Tien Shaw I., Stupak H.D. Comparison of intraoral and extraoral approaches to mandibular angle fracture repair with cost implications // The Laryngoscope. 2022. Vol. 132(3). P. 525-532.15.Kang S.H., Choi E.J., Kim H.W., Kim H.J., Cha I.H., Nam W. Complications in endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures // Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2021. Vol. 133(1). P. 49-58.16.Kommers S.C., Boffano P., ForouzanfarT. Consensus or controversy? The classification and treatment decision-making by 491 maxillofacial surgeons in isolated bilateral condylar fractures of the mandible // Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022. Vol. 50(2). P. 118-125.17.Luhr H.G., Hausmann D.F. A classification of mandibular fractures: a historical review // Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 2022. Vol. 133(5). P. 613-618.18.Nasser M., Pandis N., Fleming P.S., Fedorowicz Z., Ellis E., Ali K. Interventions for the management of mandibular fractures // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020. Issue 8. Art. No.: CD006087.19.Nogami S., Yamauchi K., Satomi N., Yamaguchi A., Takahashi K. Comparison between open reduction with internal fixation and conservative treatment with maxillomandibular fixation for mandibular condyle fractures // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021. Vol. 79(10). P. 2005-2014.20.Singh V., Bhagol A., Goel M., Kumar I., Verma A. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020. Vol. 68(6). P. 1304-1309.
Waiting