Ushbu maqola mintaqalar iqtisodiy rivojlanishidagi tafovutlarni baholashdagi zamonaviy yondashuvlarni ilmiy asoslangan holda tahlil qiladi. Kirish bo‘limida global iqtisodiyotdagi mintaqaviy tafovutlarning muhimligi, raqamlashtirish, barqarorlik va chidamlilik tendensiyalari ta’kidlangan. Adabiyotlar sharhida so‘nggi yillar ichidagi nufuzli xalqaro jurnallardagi 15 tadan ortiq maqolaga asoslanib, fazoviy modellashtirish, raqamli tahlil, chidamlilik va institutsional omillar guruhlari muhokama qilingan. Metodologiya mixed-methods dizayniga asoslangan bo‘lib, adabiyotlar sintezi va sistematik tahlilni o‘z ichiga oladi. Tahlil natijalari fazoviy avtokorrelatsiya, ekologik sezgirlik va institutsional indikatorlar orqali tafovutlarning dinamikasini ochib beradi, rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda divergensiya jarayonlarini ko‘rsatadi. Xulosada yondashuvlarning afzalliklari va cheklovlari baholanib, joyga asoslangan siyosatlar, yashil investitsiyalar va raqamli integratsiya tavsiya etilgan. Natijalar mintaqaviy tafovutlarni kamaytirishda ilmiy va amaliy qiymatga ega.
Ushbu maqola mintaqalar iqtisodiy rivojlanishidagi tafovutlarni baholashdagi zamonaviy yondashuvlarni ilmiy asoslangan holda tahlil qiladi. Kirish bo‘limida global iqtisodiyotdagi mintaqaviy tafovutlarning muhimligi, raqamlashtirish, barqarorlik va chidamlilik tendensiyalari ta’kidlangan. Adabiyotlar sharhida so‘nggi yillar ichidagi nufuzli xalqaro jurnallardagi 15 tadan ortiq maqolaga asoslanib, fazoviy modellashtirish, raqamli tahlil, chidamlilik va institutsional omillar guruhlari muhokama qilingan. Metodologiya mixed-methods dizayniga asoslangan bo‘lib, adabiyotlar sintezi va sistematik tahlilni o‘z ichiga oladi. Tahlil natijalari fazoviy avtokorrelatsiya, ekologik sezgirlik va institutsional indikatorlar orqali tafovutlarning dinamikasini ochib beradi, rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda divergensiya jarayonlarini ko‘rsatadi. Xulosada yondashuvlarning afzalliklari va cheklovlari baholanib, joyga asoslangan siyosatlar, yashil investitsiyalar va raqamli integratsiya tavsiya etilgan. Natijalar mintaqaviy tafovutlarni kamaytirishda ilmiy va amaliy qiymatga ega.
Настоящая статья анализирует современные подходы к оценке различий в экономическом развитии регионов на научной основе. Во введении подчеркивается значимость региональных различий в глобальной экономике, акцентируя тенденции, такие как цифровизация, устойчивость и резилиентность. Обзор литературы, основанный на более чем 15 статьях из престижных международных журналов за последние годы, обсуждает группы, включая пространственное моделирование, цифровой анализ, резилиентность и институциональные факторы. Методология основана на дизайне смешанных методов, включающем синтез литературы и систематический анализ. Результаты анализа раскрывают динамику различий через пространственную автокорреляцию, экологическую чувствительность и институциональные индикаторы, демонстрируя процессы дивергенции в развивающихся странах. В заключении оцениваются преимущества и ограничения подходов, рекомендуется политика, основанная на месте, зеленые инвестиции и цифровая интеграция. Результаты имеют научную и практическую ценность для сокращения региональных различий.
This article analyzes modern approaches to assessing disparities in regional economic development on a scientific basis. The introduction highlights the significance of regional disparities in the global economy, emphasizing trends such as digitalization, sustainability, and resilience. The literature review, based on over 15 articles from prestigious international journals in recent years, discusses groups including spatial modeling, digital analysis, resilience, and institutional factors. The methodology is based on a mixed-methods design, incorporating literature synthesis and systematic analysis. The analysis results reveal the dynamics of disparities through spatial autocorrelation, ecological sensitivity, and institutional indicators, demonstrating divergence processes in developing countries. The conclusion evaluates the advantages and limitations of the approaches, recommending place-based policies, green investments, and digital integration. The findings provide scientific and practical value for reducing regional disparities.
№ | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Egamov T.. | - | Abu Rayhon Beruniy nomidagi Urganch Davlat Universiteti |
№ | Name of reference |
---|---|
1 | AMRO – ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (2025) ASEAN+3 Regional Economic Outlook (April 2025). Available at: content/uploads/2025/04/AMRO-AREO-2025-Full-Report_final.pdf h |
2 | Boboev, G. (2025) ‘Modern evolutionary and institutional approaches to the analysis of economic growth in the context of global instability’, Russian Journal of Management, 13, pp.110 127. https://doi.org/10.29039/2500-1469-2025-13-5-110-127 |
3 | Buchholz, M. & Bathelt, H. (2021) ‘Models of regional economic development: illustrations using US data’, Zeitschrift https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2020-0040 Buyanova, M.E., Averina, I.S. & Horuzhaya, E.Y. (2024) ‘Current trends in the regional economic systems development: key determinants of economic growth’. In: Sergi, B.S., Popkova, E.G., Ostrovskaya, A.A., Chursin, A.A. & Ragulina, Y.V. (eds) Ecological Footprint of the Modern Economy and the Ways to Reduce It. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49711-7_64 |
4 | Chagovets, L., Prokopovych, S. & Kholod, V. (2020) ‘Data science methods for comprehensive assessment of regional economic development’, Development Management, 19(2), p.43. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/dm.18(2).2020.05 |
5 | Cörvers, F. & Mayhew, K. (2021) ‘Regional inequalities: causes and cures’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(1), pp.1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa067 |
6 | Crisp, R., Waite, D., Green, A., Hughes, C., Lupton, R., MacKinnon, D. & Pike, A. (2024) ‘‘Beyond GDP’ in cities: Assessing alternative approaches to urban economic development’, Urban Studies, 61(7), pp.1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231187884 |
7 | Cuadrado-Roura, J.R., Kourtit, K. & Nijkamp, P. (2025) ‘Spatial disparities, convergence and economic development: a global and local orientation’, Annals of Regional Science, 74, p.83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01407-0 |
8 | Digital Cooperation Organization (DCO) (2025) Digital Economy Trends (DET) 2025 Report. Available at: https://dco.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Digital-Economy-Trends-2025.pdf |
9 | Kallingal, F.R. (2022) ‘Developing a methodological framework for capturing regional disparities in social development’, R |
10 | Zheng, L., Shepherd, D. & Batuo, M.E. (2021) ‘Variations in the determinants of regional development disparities in rural China’, Journal of Rural Studies, 82, pp.29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.011 |
11 | World Bank (2025) World Development Report, Standards for Development: Concept Note (WDR2025-Concept-Note). Available at: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en /doc/82772f825d7e1b94585ab7d41e17d852-0050062025/original/WDR2025-Concept Note.pdf |
12 | Stansbury, A., Turner, D. & Balls, E. (2023) ‘Tackling the UK’s regional economic inequality: Binding constraints and avenues for policy intervention’, Contemporary Social Science, 18(3–4), pp.318–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2250745 |
13 | Smolińska-Bryza, K., Okereke, O. & Anyebe, D. (2025) ‘Regional analysis of socio-economic development: case of https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051877 |
14 | Panzera, D. & Postiglione, P. (2022) ‘The impact of regional inequality on economic growth: a spatial econometric approach’, Regional https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1910228 |
15 | OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2023) OECD Regional Outlook 2023: The Longstanding Geography of Inequalities. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/92cd40a0-en |