24

Zamonaviy dental implantologiya sohasida abatment va milk o‘rtasidagi bog‘lanish sifatiniyaxshilash katta ahamiyatga ega. Abatment-milk sathining to‘g‘ri ishlov berilishi milk bilan mustahkam va biologik jihatdan mos bog‘lanish yaratishga yordam beradi, bu esa implantning uzoq muddatli muvaffaqiyatini ta'minlaydi va atrofdagi yumshoqto‘qimalarning yallig‘lanishidan saqlaydi. Abatment vamilk o‘rtasidagi interfeysning mukammal shakllanishitish implantatsiyasida nafaqat mexanik barqarorlik, balki yumshoq to‘qimalarning estetik va funktsionalholatini ham ta'minlaydi. Shu sababli, turli ishlovberish usullarining abatment-milk bog‘lanishigata'sirini batafsil o‘rganish zarur. Bugungi kundamexanik, kimyoviy va plazma bilan ishlov berishusullari keng qo‘llanilmoqda, ammo ularningsamaradorligini to‘liq baholash uchun qiyosiytadqiqotlar yetarli emas. Mazkur tadqiqot implantologiya va ortopedikstomatologiya sohasida amaliy ahamiyatga ega bo‘lib, abatment va milk o‘rtasidagi bog‘lanish sifatinioshirish orqali implantlarning uzoq muddatli xizmatqilishini ta'minlashga qaratilgan. Qiyosiy baholashnatijalari stomatologlarga abatmentga ishlov berishusullarini tanlashda yordam beradi, bu esa milk vaatrofdagi yumshoq to‘qimalarning yaxlitligini saqlabqolish, infeksion asoratlarni kamaytirish va estetikjihatdan mukammal natijalarga erishish imkoniniberadi

  • Количество прочтений 24
  • Дата публикации 10-06-2025
  • Язык статьиO'zbek
  • Страницы140-147
Ўзбек

Zamonaviy dental implantologiya sohasida abatment va milk o‘rtasidagi bog‘lanish sifatiniyaxshilash katta ahamiyatga ega. Abatment-milk sathining to‘g‘ri ishlov berilishi milk bilan mustahkam va biologik jihatdan mos bog‘lanish yaratishga yordam beradi, bu esa implantning uzoq muddatli muvaffaqiyatini ta'minlaydi va atrofdagi yumshoqto‘qimalarning yallig‘lanishidan saqlaydi. Abatment vamilk o‘rtasidagi interfeysning mukammal shakllanishitish implantatsiyasida nafaqat mexanik barqarorlik, balki yumshoq to‘qimalarning estetik va funktsionalholatini ham ta'minlaydi. Shu sababli, turli ishlovberish usullarining abatment-milk bog‘lanishigata'sirini batafsil o‘rganish zarur. Bugungi kundamexanik, kimyoviy va plazma bilan ishlov berishusullari keng qo‘llanilmoqda, ammo ularningsamaradorligini to‘liq baholash uchun qiyosiytadqiqotlar yetarli emas. Mazkur tadqiqot implantologiya va ortopedikstomatologiya sohasida amaliy ahamiyatga ega bo‘lib, abatment va milk o‘rtasidagi bog‘lanish sifatinioshirish orqali implantlarning uzoq muddatli xizmatqilishini ta'minlashga qaratilgan. Qiyosiy baholashnatijalari stomatologlarga abatmentga ishlov berishusullarini tanlashda yordam beradi, bu esa milk vaatrofdagi yumshoq to‘qimalarning yaxlitligini saqlabqolish, infeksion asoratlarni kamaytirish va estetikjihatdan mukammal natijalarga erishish imkoniniberadi

№ Название ссылки
1 1.Albrektsson, T., & Wennerberg, A. (2004). Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17(5), 536–543.2.Anil, S., Anand, P. S., Alghamdi, H., & Jansen, J. A. (2011). Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration. Implant Dentistry, 20(2), 111–121.3.Apaza-Bedoya, K., et al. (2017). Bioactive surfaces for soft tissue integration in dental implants. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 76, 1112–1126.4.Buser, D., et al. (1992). Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 3(1), 22–32.5.Cochran, D. L., et al. (1998). Evaluation of dental implant interface with connective tissue: A review. Journal of Periodontology, 69(11), 1137–1145.6.Dhir, S. (2013). Surface modifications in endosseous dental implants. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 17(6), 798–802.7.Elias, C. N., et al. (2008). Biomedical applications of titanium and its alloys. JOM, 60(3), 46–49.8.Gittens, R. A., et al. (2014). The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the biological response to implant materials. Biomaterials Science, 2(2), 202–218.9.Grusovin, M. G., et al. (2007). Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3.10.Hall, J., et al. (2011). The effect of titanium surface roughness on the growth of human gingival fibroblasts. Journal of Periodontology, 82(3), 440–447.11.He, F. M., et al. (2009). Surface roughness, cell response and osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 93(1), 325–331.12.Hosseini, M., & Worsaae, N. (2012). Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontology 2000, 59(1), 199–214.13.Ivanovski, S., & Lee, R. (2018). Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues. Periodontology 2000, 76(1), 116–130.14.John, G., Becker, J., & Schwarz, F. (2019). Impact of different abutment and implant materials on peri-implant soft-tissue integration: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(8), 840–850.15.Jung, R. E., et al. (2008). Effect of implant design and surface on bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(1), 119–130.16.Kang, B. S., et al. (2008). Enhanced osteoblast response to hydrophilic sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 86(1), 265–273.17.Linkevicius, T., et al. (2015). Soft tissue thickness as a predictor of crestal bone changes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(9), 999–1006.18.Matsuo, K., et al. (2016). Effects of implant surface roughness and topography on the behavior of soft tissue cells. Journal of Oral Biosciences, 58(3), 101–108.19.Misch, C. E. (2015). Dental Implant Prosthetics(2nd ed.). Mosby Elsevier.20.Monje, A., et al. (2019). Peri-implant soft tissue integration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(Suppl 21), 45–66.21.Nishimura, I., et al. (2008). Biocompatibility of titanium implants. Journal of Dental Research, 87(6), 519–523.22.Novaes, A. B., et al. (2010). Soft tissueintegration with different implant abutment materials. Journal of Periodontology, 81(5), 748–757.23.Oh, T. J., et al. (2002). Significance of the biologic width on implant dentistry. Journal of Periodontology, 73(2), 164–171.24.Pjetursson, B. E., et al. (2012). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(6), 22–38.25.Rupp, F., et al. (2006). Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity of titanium implant materials. Biomaterials, 27(32), 5632–5639.26.Schwarz, F., et al. (2013). Peri-implant soft tissue integration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 40(12), 132–144.27.Souza, J. C., et al. (2015). Titanium surface modification for enhanced bioactivity. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 56, 538–551.28.Suárez-López Del Amo, F., et al. (2016). Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants. Journal of Periodontology, 87(4), 495–505.29.Wennerberg, A., & Albrektsson, T. (2009). Effects of titanium surface topography onbone integration. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(S4), 172–184.30.Zitzmann, N. U., & Berglundh, T. (2008). Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(Suppl. 8), 286–291.31.Abrahamsson, I., & Berglundh, T. (2006). Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 8(3), 107–113.32.Canullo, L., et al. (2014). Soft tissue response to different abutment materials and designs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(9), 1045–1050.33.Le Guéhennec, L., et al. (2007). Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Materials, 23(7), 844–854.34.Quirynen, M., et al. (2002). The clinical impact of the surface roughness of oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13(3), 229–238.35.Trisi, P., & Rao, W. (1999). Bone classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 10(1), 1–7.
В ожидании