In this article, we made a comparative analysis of teaching topics related to Artificial Intelligence and
Robotics in the subject of “Informatics and information technology” at general secondary education in Uzbekistan and
different foreign countries. Based on our studies, we assumed that the teaching the topics related to basics of artificial
intelligence and robotics in the subject of “Informatics and information technology” in general secondary educati on will
help students to form digital competencies. In order to justify this hypothesis, we analyzed whether digital competences
can be formed in students in the process of learning artificial intelligence and robotics
In this article, we made a comparative analysis of teaching topics related to Artificial Intelligence and
Robotics in the subject of “Informatics and information technology” at general secondary education in Uzbekistan and
different foreign countries. Based on our studies, we assumed that the teaching the topics related to basics of artificial
intelligence and robotics in the subject of “Informatics and information technology” in general secondary educati on will
help students to form digital competencies. In order to justify this hypothesis, we analyzed whether digital competences
can be formed in students in the process of learning artificial intelligence and robotics
В данной статье мы провели сравнительный анализ преподавания тем, связанных с
искусственным интеллектом и робототехникой, по предмету «Информатика и информационные технологии» в
системе общего среднего образования Узбекистана и разных зарубежных стран. На основании наших
исследований мы предположили, что преподавание тем, связанных с основами искусственного интеллекта и
робототехники, по предмету «Информатика и информационные технологии» в общем среднем образовании
поможет учащимся сформировать цифровые компетенции. Для обоснования этой гипотезы мы проанализировали,
могут ли цифровые компетенции формироваться у студентов в процессе обучения искусственному интеллекту и
робототехнике.
Ushbu maqolada biz Oʻzbekiston va turli xorijiy mamlakatlardagi umumiy oʻrta taʼlim
muassasalarida “Informatika va axborot texnologiyalari” fanida sunʼiy intellekt va robototexnika mavzularini oʻqitishning
qiyosiy tahlilini oʻtkazdik. Tadqiqotlarimiz asosida umumiy oʻrta taʼlimdagi informatika va axborot texnologiyalari fanida
sunʼiy intellekt va robototexnika asoslariga doir mavzularni oʻqitish oʻquvchilarda raqamli kompetensiyalarni shakllantirishga yordam beradi, deb taxmin qildik. Ushbu gipotezani asoslash uchun biz raqamli kompetensiyalarni sunʼiy intellekt va robototexnikani oʻrganish jarayonida oʻquvchilarda shakllantirish mumkinligini tahlil qildik.
№ | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Abdujalilov J.A. | mustaqil tadqiqotchi | TATU |
№ | Havola nomi |
---|---|
1 | Doniyorbek Ahmadaliev, Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally //The Effects of Educational Robotics on STEM Studentsʼ Engagement and Reflective Thinking. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference 2022, pp 111-118. |
2 | B. Sisman and S. Kucuk, “An Educational Robotics Course: Examination of Educational Potentials and Pre-Service Teachersʼ Experiences,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2019 vol. 5, no.2, pp. 510-531. |
3 | G. K. Wong, X. Ma, P. Dillenbourg and J. Huan, “Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: where to start?,”. ACM Inroads 2020, vol.11, no. 1, pp. 20-29. |
4 | McCarthy, J. What is artificial intelligence? // Computer Science Department, Stanford University. November 12, 2007. |
5 | T. Sapounidis and D. Alimisis, “Educational robotics for STEM: A review of technologies and some educational considerations,” In Science and mathematics education for 21st century citizens: Challenges and ways forward. Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, September 2020, pp. 167-190. |
6 | M. Çetin and H. Ö. Demircan, “Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review,” Early Child Development and Care 2018, vol.190, no. 9, pp. 1323- 1335. |
7 | L. Negrini, “Teacher training in educational robotics,” In Robotics in Education, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2019, pp. 92- 97. |
8 | M. Chevalier, C. Giang, A, Piatti, and F. Mondada, “Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving,” International Journal of STEM Education 2020, vol. 7, no. 1. pp. 142- 147. |
9 | UNESCO, (2019), Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence, Outcome Document of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 16-18 May 2019. pp. 12- 17. |
10 | Taguma, M., Feron, E., & Lim, M. H. (2018). Future of education and skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. |
11 | Kahn, K. (1977). Three interactions between AI and education. In E. Elcock, & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8: Machine representations of knowledge. Ellis Horwood Ltd. and John Wylie & Sons |
12 | Kahn, K., & Winters, N. (2021). Constructionism and AI: A history and possible futures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, pp 1130–1142. |
13 | Silva Marques, Lívia & Gresse von Wangenheim, Christiane & Hauck, Jean. (2020). Teaching Machine Learning in School: A Systematic Mapping of the State of the Art. Informatics in Education. 19. |
14 | https://lex.uz/docs/5297046 |
15 | https://lex.uz/docs/5603319 |
16 | https://www.lex.uz/docs/5544451 |
17 | https://lex.uz/docs/5746496 |
18 | Akhmedov R.Sh. (2024). The Theme of AI Technologies in American Science Fiction. Tadqiqotlar 35(3): 84-87. |